Key Features
Apollo API vs Lix API
Apollo is renowned for its multiple sales-focused features, including their API. For those prioritising real-time LinkedIn data via API, with more endpoints, Lix may come out on top.
| Feature |  |
 |
|---|---|---|
| People Search | ||
| Email Finding | ||
| Company Data Enrichment | ||
| LinkedIn Jobs Search | ||
| LinkedIn Jobs Enrichment | ||
| LinkedIn Posts Search | ||
| LinkedIn Posts Enrichment | ||
| LinkedIn Activity Enrichment |
Trusted by some of the world’s leading companies
Navigating B2B Data APIs: A Closer Look at Lix and Apollo
If you use cold emails for prospecting, you’ll know ZoomInfo. They are an industry-leader in email finding and offer multiple sales enablement features. If you’re looking for real-time LinkedIn data across a range of data points however, Lix may be the better option.
Lix API vs. Apollo API: A Comprehensive Comparison
Data Source & Freshness
Lix API: Lix’s API provides access to real-time LinkedIn data, ensuring that you always have the freshest and most up-to-date information. This is particularly valuable for use cases like tracking job postings, monitoring LinkedIn profile changes, or analysing the latest market trends.
Apollo API: Apollo’s API draws from its rich internal data repository, offering data on people, organisations, and opportunities. However, the data is not pulled in real-time from LinkedIn, which could result in less current information compared to Lix. Apollo’s API is better suited for enriching databases and automating outreach efforts within its CRM system, rather than Lix's suitable for integrating with your own tools and CRM.
Rate Limits
Lix API: The standard rate limit is 1 request every 3 seconds, but this can be increased to 1 call per second for enterprise users. This makes Lix’s API highly reliable for consistent access to real-time data, though it might not support extremely high-volume bursts.
Apollo API: Apollo employs a fixed-window rate-limiting strategy, with limits depending on the pricing plan. For example, with a 50 requests per minute limit, those requests can be made at any interval within that minute. This structure allows for higher burst rates but within a fixed window, which may be useful for specific CRM integration tasks.
Functionality & Integration
Lix API: Designed specifically for accessing real-time LinkedIn data, the Lix API is ideal for applications that require the most current professional information. It provides endpoints for LinkedIn profiles, jobs, and posts, making it a specialised tool for those needing precise and immediate data.
Apollo API: While offering extensive data management capabilities, the Apollo API is tightly integrated with Apollo’s CRM system. It includes endpoints for managing records and automating workflows, which are more tailored to enhancing internal CRM functionalities rather than providing external, versatile data access.
Conclusion
The choice between the Lix LinkedIn API and Apollo API hinges on your specific business needs. If your priority is obtaining real-time LinkedIn data for use cases like job monitoring or professional profile updates, Lix is the superior choice with its focus on real-time information. On the other hand, if you need a more integrated solution for managing CRM data and automating outreach within the Apollo CRM ecosystem, Apollo’s API is the best option.